<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tip: Design Websites for Mobile&#8230;First</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/</link>
	<description>a leadership, technology, and innovation blog for pastors and church leaders</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Calum&#8217;s Concise Blog Summary #7 &#124; Calum Henderson</title>
		<link>http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/comment-page-1/#comment-169488</link>
		<dc:creator>Calum&#8217;s Concise Blog Summary #7 &#124; Calum Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/?p=1015#comment-169488</guid>
		<description>[...] Tip: Design Websites for Mobile…First [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tip: Design Websites for Mobile…First [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NFL Vegas Odds</title>
		<link>http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/comment-page-1/#comment-165315</link>
		<dc:creator>NFL Vegas Odds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/?p=1015#comment-165315</guid>
		<description>This is a pretty good idea.  I can think of plenty of sites that would be a lot better off if they just put the relevant content front and center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a pretty good idea.  I can think of plenty of sites that would be a lot better off if they just put the relevant content front and center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techlesia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; De-stinkify your church Web site</title>
		<link>http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/comment-page-1/#comment-158866</link>
		<dc:creator>techlesia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; De-stinkify your church Web site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/?p=1015#comment-158866</guid>
		<description>[...] any techie geeks.  Don&#8217;t just post every piece of information imaginable.  Bobby Gruenewald suggests that we design our mobile site first, before we do anything else.  This forces us to cut the fluff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any techie geeks.  Don&#8217;t just post every piece of information imaginable.  Bobby Gruenewald suggests that we design our mobile site first, before we do anything else.  This forces us to cut the fluff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antwon Davis</title>
		<link>http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/comment-page-1/#comment-158631</link>
		<dc:creator>Antwon Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/?p=1015#comment-158631</guid>
		<description>I have an iPhone and I know first-hand why it is like to visit a site and after 2 minutes of trying to navigate, promise to never visit the site via phone ever again. I think this is great insight for all web developers to consider mobile apps for their sites, especially church websites. 

Interesting post. 

THINK &#124; CHANGE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an iPhone and I know first-hand why it is like to visit a site and after 2 minutes of trying to navigate, promise to never visit the site via phone ever again. I think this is great insight for all web developers to consider mobile apps for their sites, especially church websites. </p>
<p>Interesting post. </p>
<p>THINK | CHANGE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Fogg</title>
		<link>http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/comment-page-1/#comment-158622</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Fogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/?p=1015#comment-158622</guid>
		<description>Hey Bobby,

Funny thing, we were just having the same conversation yesterday! 

My thoughts are: how do we make it a outreach tool rather than just another way to view the website. Is there a way to focus down on one or two objectives and do them really well.

I've thought about making it more of an invitation tool/calendar or events tool. One that would make it easy and more of a tool for ministry than just reading.

Another idea was to have some way of viraly spreading bite size video pieces throughout your mobile address book via SMS or MMS which would feel more personal from the invitee rather than from an institution.

Rather than putting huge investment on the front end can we just make it easy for people to connect with a great message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bobby,</p>
<p>Funny thing, we were just having the same conversation yesterday! </p>
<p>My thoughts are: how do we make it a outreach tool rather than just another way to view the website. Is there a way to focus down on one or two objectives and do them really well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve thought about making it more of an invitation tool/calendar or events tool. One that would make it easy and more of a tool for ministry than just reading.</p>
<p>Another idea was to have some way of viraly spreading bite size video pieces throughout your mobile address book via SMS or MMS which would feel more personal from the invitee rather than from an institution.</p>
<p>Rather than putting huge investment on the front end can we just make it easy for people to connect with a great message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Bowman</title>
		<link>http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/comment-page-1/#comment-158616</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/?p=1015#comment-158616</guid>
		<description>Great post! Moving ahead with getting our church's site mobile-ready. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! Moving ahead with getting our church&#8217;s site mobile-ready. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Russell</title>
		<link>http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/comment-page-1/#comment-158614</link>
		<dc:creator>David Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/?p=1015#comment-158614</guid>
		<description>Excellent thoughts, Bobby. There are a few mobile sites that I actually prefer to use in the traditional desktop browser environment over their built-for-desktop counterpart because of the very reasons you illustrate—simplicity and efficiency.

A few that I love to use are The New York Times, CNN, BBC, ESPN, Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, Google Reader, YouVersion and Weather.gov.

There are very few sites that I regularly use that do &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; offer a version for mobile devices. It's not that I avoid sites that don't offer it, it's that the sites I use understand the importance of accessibility. Every church in the world should strategically consider each visitor to their site and offer versions that are accessible beyond common browsers, operating systems and hardware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent thoughts, Bobby. There are a few mobile sites that I actually prefer to use in the traditional desktop browser environment over their built-for-desktop counterpart because of the very reasons you illustrate—simplicity and efficiency.</p>
<p>A few that I love to use are The New York Times, CNN, BBC, ESPN, Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, Google Reader, YouVersion and Weather.gov.</p>
<p>There are very few sites that I regularly use that do <em>not</em> offer a version for mobile devices. It&#8217;s not that I avoid sites that don&#8217;t offer it, it&#8217;s that the sites I use understand the importance of accessibility. Every church in the world should strategically consider each visitor to their site and offer versions that are accessible beyond common browsers, operating systems and hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Adamski</title>
		<link>http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/comment-page-1/#comment-158609</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Adamski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/?p=1015#comment-158609</guid>
		<description>I agree. Technology is moving in the direction of mobility. So it show be our first hurdle. It almost seems like we are moving laterally with this type of development, remember the dial-up 800*600 days. My favorite mobile sites are; http://m.youversion.com and http://wap.nfl.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Technology is moving in the direction of mobility. So it show be our first hurdle. It almost seems like we are moving laterally with this type of development, remember the dial-up 800*600 days. My favorite mobile sites are; <a href="http://m.youversion.com" rel="nofollow">http://m.youversion.com</a> and <a href="http://wap.nfl.com" rel="nofollow">http://wap.nfl.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Martorana</title>
		<link>http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/comment-page-1/#comment-158608</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Martorana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/?p=1015#comment-158608</guid>
		<description>Great advice. I'm currently working on putting the site I'm working on into mobile, usability is key. It definitely makes you think. The New York Times site on iphone is probably the best I've seen, I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice. I&#8217;m currently working on putting the site I&#8217;m working on into mobile, usability is key. It definitely makes you think. The New York Times site on iphone is probably the best I&#8217;ve seen, I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heady</title>
		<link>http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/2008/10/15/tip-design-websites-for-mobilefirst/comment-page-1/#comment-158606</link>
		<dc:creator>Heady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swerve.lifechurch.tv/?p=1015#comment-158606</guid>
		<description>thanks for the pointers bobby.  good stuff.  as you stated, even if i didn't design for mobile these are great questions to ask myself while considering my web design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the pointers bobby.  good stuff.  as you stated, even if i didn&#8217;t design for mobile these are great questions to ask myself while considering my web design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

