categories: church, innovation, leadership, personal, vision
Feedburner Digg Del.icio.us Technorati

March 5th, 2007

by Bobby Gruenewald

6 comments (+ Add)

Stop trying to be number 1!

You should be better than that!

My friends at churchrelevance.com have compiled a list of the “Top 22 Churches in America”. I know that “everyone” loves lists…but I’ll once again go on the record as someone who is NOT a fan of church lists (in particular) and I will do my best to explain why.

I have a great deal of respect for Kent at churchrelevance.com and am confident that his effort is designed to help other churches be more successful in their mission. He says, “I find lists valuable in helping me to know which churches are worth studying.”
What concerns me is that these lists are often given far more credibility than they deserve and consequently influence churches to a greater degree than is appropriate. Here are my words of caution to those of you attempting to study or learn from the lists.

  • ALL of these lists are simply trying to recognize something that happened last year or in some cases even later than last year (as in THE PAST)
  • As fast as this world is changing churches should NOT be looking to last year’s methods/ideas to reach today’s culture. 2006 is not 2007 (February is not March)
  • Though some leaders will study what these churches do and use it as a springboard for new ideas for the future…most will attempt to do exactly the same thing except this time a year or two later…what I call “lemming leadership”
  • I still see thousands of churches trying their hardest to become like the #1 church of 1995 only to find out that the world has changed by the time they get there.
  • I hear from several church leaders that it takes their church a long time to embrace new changes (sometimes as long as 5 years). If that is true for you…I suggest you point your churches’ trajectory at what the church of 2012 looks like.

Please. Please. Please!! Seek what God would have YOU do and don’t aim to be the #1 church of 2006 (It’s already 2007).

add a comment

Feedburner Digg Del.icio.us Technorati

Related Posts

  • No Related Post

Comments

there are a total of6
  1. Mar 5, 2007 at 11:44 am

    Thanks so much for blogging. I have gleaned so much reading your thoughts and insights. As a new church planter, I find lots of help and encouragement in what you write. As far as lists, you are on my top 10…grins.

  2. Mar 5, 2007 at 1:30 pm

    {applause}

    And you bring up a related, but to me equally interesting point…

    How does LifeChurch.tv “measure” it’s health? What are the key indicators to which you look to identify health or not-so-health?

    Many churches seem to measure growth and do so with numbers related to attendance, membership, conversions/baptisms, etc.

    Are there some other paradigms out there for determining if a local gathering of Christ followers are hitting the mark (what is the right mark)?

  3. Mar 6, 2007 at 8:59 am

    This is a very interesting take. I love the idea of aggregating the ideas on the 7 lists. It added a perspective that was missing on any single list. At the same time, you make some really important points here! The observation that many churches are aiming at becoming the #1 church of 1995 is dead on. The obvious challenge…how to anticipate where things are actually going and move in that direction!

    Thanks for an insightful post!

    mark

  4. Mar 6, 2007 at 1:32 pm

    I totally agree with your “lemming leadership” theory, and expand on it this way. What makes these churches the most successful churches in nation? I would say that these churches are the most progressive churches in the nation, and that is what makes them successful. You can’t learn to be progressive by looking at other churches. To become progressive you first thing you do is get the best, most creative, excited for lead other people to God people you can find and hire them. Then you tell them to go and give them the freedom to be progressive and creative. That is how you become a successful/progressive/creative church.

  5. Mar 8, 2007 at 3:03 pm

    The first thing I thought of when i read your post…I bet they are number one…

    Its ok to be number one…it gives us something to beat…
    :)

Add a Comment

« Back to text comment